Hazard Communication

What is Hazard Communication Standard?
According to OSHA, “in order to ensure chemical safety in the workplace, information about the identities and hazards of the chemicals must be available and understandable to workers.” The Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) by OSHA calls for the “chemical manufacturers and importers to evaluate the hazards for the chemicals they produce or import, and prepare labels and safety data sheets to convey the hazard information to their downstream customers.” It also requires, “all employers with hazardous chemicals in their workplaces to have labels and safety data sheets for their exposed workers, and train them to handle the chemicals appropriately.”
1910.1200 - Hazard Communication
The Hazard Communication Standard is under 1910.1200 (subpart Z). The change that has been made to this standard is consistent with the provisions of the United Nations Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). The Hazard Communication Page on OSHA has downloadable versions of the 1910.1200 Final Rule and appendices that are updated to align with GHS.
What is the Globally Harmonized System?
According to OSHA the Globally Harmonized System (GHS), “is an international approach to hazard communication, providing agreed criteria for the classification of chemical hazards, and a standardized approach to label elements and safety data sheets. The result of this change and negotiation process resulted in a document entitled, Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals” also known as The Purple Book. The documents provide criteria for the health, physical, and environmental hazards of chemicals, as well as standardized label elements, signal words, and a standardized information safety data sheet.
Why did OSHA modify the Hazard Communication Standard to adopt the GHS?
The fundamental reason why they modified the standard is to improve the safety and health of workers through more effective communications on chemical hazards. The initial standard is performance-oriented, allowing manufacturers to put their information on labels and material safety data sheets in whatever format they choose. The GHS is more effective using a standardized approach. This includes detailed criteria for determining what hazards affect a chemical. According to OSHA, this approach will, “enhance both employer and worker comprehension of the hazards, which will help to ensure appropriate handling and safe use of workplace chemicals.” Adopting GHS will improve all the information that is received from other countries, considering that the US is a major importer and exporter of chemicals, it is more efficient for the labels and safety data sheets to be standardized.
Definitions for the Hazard Communication Standard
According to OSHA, these are key definitions and changes that were recently made to the Hazard Communication Standard:
- Hazard classification: Provides specific criteria for the classification of health and physical hazards, as well as classifications of mixtures.
- Labels: Chemical manufacturers and importers will be required to provide a label that includes a harmonized signal word, pictogram, and hazards statement for each hazard class and category. Precautionary statements must also be provided.
- Safety Data Sheets: Will now have a specified 16- section format.
- Information and training: Employers are required to train workers on the new labels elements and safety data sheets format to facilitate recognition and understanding.
OSHA’s Steps to an Effective Hazard Communication Program for Employers That Use Hazardous Chemicals
- Learn the standard and identity the responsible staff.
- Prepare and implement a written hazard communication program.
- Ensure containers are labeled.
- Maintain safety data sheets.
- Inform and train employees.
- Evaluate and reassess your program.
If you would like to learn more about each step, click here to view OSHA’s recommendations.
Citations
https://www.osha.gov/hazcom/faq

A Superfund site is
an area designated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that
have been classified as being heavily contaminated with hazardous substances. These
substances may include chemicals, pollutants, or other toxic materials that
could have a significant risk to human health and the environment.
How Superfund site was created
According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), "In the late 1970s, toxic waste dumps, such as Love Canal and Valley of the Drums, received national attention when the public learned about the human health and environmental risks posed by the contaminated sites. In response, Congress established the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) in 1980." This law was created to enforce the responsibility of parties involved in contamination to clean up the sites or compensate the government for EPA's cleanup efforts. In cases where no responsible party is identified for the cleanup or reimbursement, the EPA assumes responsibility for cleaning up the contaminated area. The CERCLA act is commonly referred to as a Superfund Site.
CERCLA Act
According to the EPA “The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), commonly known as Superfund, was enacted by Congress on December 11, 1980. This law created a tax on the chemical and petroleum industries and provided broad Federal authority to respond directly to releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances that may endanger public health or the environment. Over five years, $1.6 billion was collected and the tax went to a trust fund for cleaning up abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous waste sites."
The purpose of CERCLA
According to the EPA: The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA):
· established prohibitions and requirements concerning closed and abandoned hazardous waste sites;
· provided for liability of persons responsible for releases of hazardous waste at these sites; and
· established a trust fund to provide for cleanup when no responsible party could be identified.
How Superfund site are chosen
According to the EPA, sites are chosen by “Using Hazard Ranking System (HRS) criteria, EPA, its state and tribal partners, or the appropriate federal department or agency then conduct a preliminary assessment and, if warranted, a site inspection or other more in-depth assessment.” Sites that have a HRS score below 28.50 do not qualify for the National Priorities List (NPL) and are assigned to a No Further Remedial Action Planned (NFRAP) decision.
CTI offers safety consulting and the cleanup of sites and contaminated locations. If you have questions or comments, call CTI at 562.608.8401 or email info@ctienviro.com.
Citations:
References available, upon request please contact us.






